Review of fox 21 news::how do i email whp-tv channel 21
Review of fox 21 news::how do i email whp-tv channel 21
In 2003, Charlotte Ross, playing Detective Connie McDowell, revealed her backside in an "NYPD Blue" episode. Now, the too risqué for television shot is known as the "NYPD Blue" Charlotte Ross shower scene. Since the racy show exposed a bit too much, ABC has been involved in a legal battle with the Federal Communications Commission. According to dailymail.co.uk.com, the penalty against ABC and 45 of its affiliate stations for showing the shower scene is over $1 million. Now, claiming "nudity itself is not per se indecent," the U.S. Second Circuit of Court Appeals has snuffed out the $1.21 million fine. This is definitely not the first indecency war the FCC has waged against a television network. Another lengthy battle is the one with Fox concerning "fleeting obscenities." According to an L.A. Times Blog, in 2004 the FCC announced networks "could be fined" for obscenities uttered and aired during "a live broadcast." Furthermore, the decision came on the heels of two "awards shows in 2002 and 2003 in which swearing by Cher and Nicole Richie was not bleeped in time" by the Fox network. At first, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the FCC. The court found "fleeting expletives indecent." This decision meant that the expletives used "during live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards show" were inappropriate. Calling it a "victory for parents," the Parents Television Council applauded the ruling. Although the incident did not garner a fine from the FCC, Fox still "challenged the rules in court" with an appeal. After all, they didn't want a precedent for FCC fines in the future. Some of the issues addressed in court were the inconsistencies in indecency regulations and enforcements. In other words, sometimes networks were unclear about when a show was indecent or not. Another major issue centered on violations of the First Amendment. In the end, the courts viewed the FCC's actions as a form of censorship. In fact, the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York deemed the FCC's actions "unconstitutionally vague and chilling." However, the FCC was not satisfied with the Second Circuit's ruling and filed for an appeal in August of 2010. Therefore, it seems that this battle against indecency versus censorship will continue to wage. The recent victory of the "NYPD Blue" case is just another point for those who champion the First Amendment. Yet some are arguing that since the bare backside on "NYPD Blue" was scripted and intentional, it deserves punishment. Tim Winter, president of the Parents Television Council, says, "This ruling will only serve to embolden the networks to air even more graphic material." Thus, will these cases lead to more indecency on television, or are the court rulings simply protecting the Constitution? Sources: Daily Mail Reporter Court ruling on NYPD Blue nude shot 'will lead to more graphic scenes on TV' dailymail.co.uk Joe Flint Appeals court swears off FCC's indecency rules latimesblogs.latimes.com PTC Lauds Supreme Court Ruling Finding "Fleeting" Expletives Indecent parentstv.org PTC Applauds FCC Appeal of Fox Indecency Ruling parentstv.org |
Image of fox 21 news
fox 21 news Image 1
fox 21 news Image 2
fox 21 news Image 3
fox 21 news Image 4
fox 21 news Image 5
Related blog with fox 21 news
Related Video with fox 21 news
fox 21 news Video 1
fox 21 news Video 2
fox 21 news Video 3
fox 21 news
Labels: Duluth Fox News 21, Fox 21 Colorado Springs, Fox 21 News Colorado Springs, Fox 21 News Greenville SC, MSNBC News, Obituaries Greenville SC News, WLOS, WYFF News 4
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home